For instance, if I have a new anthology out (which I do, go buy it!), but that anthology has a unicorn story in it (not Brave New Love, but stay tuned for April!), then that antho has to be cross listed on my new releases page, my books page, my unicorn page, and my short fiction page. (You guys, I also just realized that apparently, under my unicorn heading, I have an entire “short works” page devoted ONLY to the unicorn short fiction, which was originally just a mirror of my other short fiction page, because until this month the only short fiction I’ve published is unicorn stuff, but seeing as that is about to change drastically this year……. GAH.)

Why did I do it like this? WHY??????

I mean, I know why. Things were a lot more simple, category-wise, when I designed the website. I’d published three books and two essays. And to be honest, I’m still not sure of a better way to do it. Fantasy vs. contemporary? Adult vs. YA? But still break out short fiction? I know I need a new site design, eventually, but I’m hoping to hold off on that for six months or so…

Anyway, after hours and hours of messing with links and updates and resizing images and fixing widgets, I kind of threw up my hands and decided I’d rather finish my taxes (YES I WOULD) than check any more links, which is why my printable booklist page is still a little out of date, and some of the widgets need adjusting, and there are links to non-existent Borders pages throughout the site. Sorry. Don’t click the Borders links.

So then I finished my taxes, and did a whole other admin thing I’ve been putting off for far too long.

Boring, right? I mean, not my website. My website is all very pretty. Go check it out in full.

And realize that the whole thing is probably going to be changing AGAIN in the next few weeks, as I receive final word on not one, but THREE secret projects that will be available in April/May that I will have covers and such to show you soon soon soon.

And possibly four. Stay tuned.

~Diana

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

So you’re not going to want to miss this:

The Girl Who Was on Fire – Movie Edition

Your Favorite Authors on Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games Trilogy

edited by Leah Wilson

Katniss Everdeen’s adventures may have come to an end, but her story continues to blaze in the hearts of millions worldwide.

In The Girl Who Was on Fire – Movie Edition, sixteen YA authors take you back to Panem with moving, dark, and funny pieces on Katniss, the Games, Gale and Peeta, reality TV, survival, and more.

• How does the way the Games affect the brain explain Haymitch’s drinking, Annie’s distraction, and Wiress’ speech problems?

• What does the rebellion have in common with the War on Terror?

• Why isn’t the answer to “Peeta or Gale?” as interesting as the question itself?

• What should Panem have learned from the fates of other hedonistic societies throughout history—and what can we?

The Girl Who Was On Fire covers all three books in the Hunger Games trilogy.

E-Book Version Only: Get access to special movie content from our writers right after the release of The Hunger Games end of March!

Already have the original edition? Get just the new content (including the special movie extra!) with the Booster Pack: for Kindle, Nook, or iBooks.

A Note from Diana on her contribution, “Hunger Game Theory”: I was fascinated by the way the players of the Hunger Games had studied and changed the way they participated over the years, creating “career tributes” or elaborate personal stories, true or otherwise, that might help them in the arena. Collins’ attention to detail in this matter was one of the highlights of the books for me, and showed a focus on the truth of how games are played that are missing in a lot of fictional games. This is what I examine in my essay, available only in the movie edition.

>> Buy now

• Amazon
• Barnes & Noble
• Indie Bound
• Kindle
• Nook
• iBooks

Or, enter this giveaway. Just leave a comment here. Contest runs through Friday.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

Parents have all sorts of reasons to justify their name choices. They name children to honor family members or friends, living or dead, or to invoke qualities or feelings or to “borrow” the qualities and feelings they might attribute to saints, celebrities, or other well-known bearers of said name. They name children things that sound “unique” to indicate how special their child is to them, or go the other way and give their child a name they know (or think they know) that everyone will easily be able to spell and pronounce.

When parents name their children, they are making a statement about that child. When a writer names a character, she is doing the same thing. The fortunate thing is that, when naming a character, I can cheat. I already know that I’m naming the villain, so I can pretend that years ago, his mother looked at his precious little infant face and went, “He just looks like a Lucifer Evilius Blackheart McNasty to me.”

And sometimes, what that character’s parents are like really informs the name they are given. Take, for example, Poe, whose real name is James Timshel Orcutt. With Poe, I got to have the best of both worlds. He got his Evil von Villainous society name (it doesn’t get much more nefarious and intimidating than Poe), and the name that sounds like it was given to him by the people we later learn are his parents. He also gets a far softer nickname, Jamie, that takes both Amy and the reader by surprise when they learn it — a calculating moment in the text.

Another name which says as much about the character’s parents as the character is Astrid. Astrid hates her own name, because it’s a symbol of everything her mother wants her to be — a warrior with a long family legacy. If Astrid had her druthers, her name would probably be Jessica or Katie or Amanda. But if you know Astrid’s mother, you’d know that would never be an option.

With fiction, the author can also control everything that ever happens to that character as a result of their name. You can name a character Richard and pretend that no one ever made Dick jokes at his expense. (Or, if your character is Astrid, and you’re as cruel to her as I am, you can make sure the reader knows exactly how many jokes she suffered.) It should come as no surprise that I was much more concerned about the ridicule my actual child might receive on behalf of the name I gave her than what any book reviewer says about my character names. Astrid is pretend. She won’t be scarred for life if you make fun of her name.

My kid is a real person, and when I named her, I had to imagine saying that name a hundred times a day for the rest of both of our lives. I had to picture her writing it at the top of every form she ever received. I had to picture it being a name that suited her when she was a baby, when she was a child, when she was a teenager, an adult, an old woman. I had to imagine it suiting her if she decided to become an actress or a physicist or a pilot or a politician. One of the best pieces of advice I got when I was naming my child is to practice the name. Go out and order a coffee at Starbucks using that name. Use it in a dozen sentences. “Diana, go clean your room.” “I have to go pick up Amy from preschool.” “I’m sorry, Astrid can’t come to the phone right now.” “Elliot, you get inside right this very minute!” “Hello, this is Philippa speaking, how can I help you?”

By the end of my pregnancy, Sailor Boy was going nuts. He’d thought we’d narrowed the name list down ages ago, but I kept coming up with new options. (poor man. It’s one of the hazards of living with a writer. And, to be fair, we decided on Rio’s name super quickly.)

And if you’re a big name nerd, like I realized I was when I discovered all these name blogs, and an author, you’re in real luck. Because I’m not going to have as many kids as names I’d love to use, and there are all kinds of names I wouldn’t give an actual child (or that I’d never be able to convince Sailor Boy to use) that I can bestow on my fictional children. Names like Malou (a nickname for Mary-Louise), that I used on the main character in one of the stories I have coming out this year. I have enough names to last a whole career, now. And no, they aren’t all “weird” either. Like I said in the comments section of yesterday’s post, I have another short story coming out in April where the protagonist’s name is Andrew.

Yes, he’s a guy.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

They also taught me that everything I thought I knew about names were wrong.

For instance, while I thought “traditional” names were things like Michael and Elizabeth, they showed me that the Pilgrims on the Mayflower were naming their kids Journey, Oceanus, Wrestling, and Truelove, and that names I thought were very modern, like Chad, actually have roots dating back to 7th century saints.

When I complained about “boy” names like Hunter and James being used on girls, they reminded me that names like Lindsay, Ashley, Carol, and Kimberly were all “boy names” until relatively recently. Names like “Ashton” very nearly went girl, too, until a male celebrity yanked it back into the “blue” territory.

When I was curious about “weird” names, they informed me that the naming traditions so often attributed these days to celebrities or teen moms is actually as old as naming itself. For instance, did you know that the medieval queen Eleanor of Aquitane’s grandmother was named Dangereuse?!?!? Talk about a hot name! And when you find out that 7th century residents of Cornwall were named things like Loveday and Applyn, you’re inclined to give Gwyneth Paltrow a break.

(Speaking of “celebrity names” — the ones that make the news are… well, the ones who make the news. Many of the richest people in Hollywood give their kids names no one thinks are weird at all. Tom Hanks named his first two kids Colin and Elizabeth, Jim Carrey’s daughter is named Jane, and Ray Romano has a Gregory, Alexandra, Matthew, and Joseph! Name blogs taught me that, too.)

When I began to question the “proper” spelling of a given name, they taught me how slippery spelling has always been. Sometimes people spelled their OWN name a variety of ways, as they felt like it. The name I used for my daughter has a variety of spellings (as does my own name) and though we use the most popular (in the US) one (again, just like my name) people tend to assume the spelling they first came across is the “right” one.

So now, I worry less when I see a reader response to my book that questions the names.

When some reader calls Giovanni a stupid name, I think to myself, “this reader must not be aware that it’s as basic as it gets — in Giovanni’s mom’s home country of Italy, where it means ‘John.’” (And where it falls in the expected top-20 of naming popularity).

When they make fun of Astrid, I think, “Join the club. Astrid has been forced to witness her name being made fun of all her life by Americans who don’t realize what a popular choice it is in Scandanavia (top 50 in several countries), where Astrid’s parents met.” The characters in that book all have unusual names, because their families are part of a very specific heritage and name their children in reflection of that heritage. I got some snickers at Philippa’s name (though it’s always been way more common in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand) when Rampant came out, in 2009, but not anymore — a certain royal wedding attendant sent Philippa (who is close to the age of the fictional Philippa) to the very tip top of naming trends.

When they question the wisdom of me naming a character’s (male) love interest Yves (usually while misspelling it “Eve”), I shrug it off. Maybe they didn’t have that cute kid named Yves in their neighborhood growing up, like I did. Like the real Yves I knew, the Yves in “The Care and Feeding of Your Baby Killer Unicorn” has Moroccan heritage, and his French name (like Yves St. Laurent, the designer!) reflects that.

And when people who haven’t read more than the description of For Darkness Shows the Stars ridicule the name choices, I shrug again. For not only are the names in that book nods to the source material of Persuasion (Elliot North = Anne Elliot and Captain Malakai Wentforth = Captain Frederick Wentworth), they also possess meaning within the book itself. I never pick names in a vacuum, and the names in this book are possibly more meaningful than any names I’ve ever chosen, for reasons that become clear to the reader as they read.

What’s really unusual about the names, perhaps, is how normal they actually are. The book takes places hundreds and hundreds of years in the future. The names we use today are not necessarily similar to the names of seven hundred years ago. That they are so similar to names used today speaks more to the makeup of my futuristic society — they’re a very backwards-facing, tradition-oriented society, and thus you’ll see names that sound familiar, and even old-fashioned to us: things like Victoria, Benedict, Tatiana, Olivia, and Horatio.

If the names aren’t realistic to the ones you’d hear today — well, good. I didn’t intend them to be.

(Continued tomorrow, in part two. Meanwhile, thank you  baby name bloggers. You make my job so much more fun.)

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

This morning, when Queenie woke up crying before the sun rose, Sailor Boy let me stay in bed. Happy Birthday to Me!

And now I work. I’m trying to finish a project today, before Sailor Boy and I go out to dinner.

Meanwhile: here’s today’s post at Genreality.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

The deadlines are for my last contracted book. It’s with Harper (Balzer+Bray). It’s YA. That’s all I’m saying right now.

The kid has a cold. Nothing serious, but she’s pretty miserable. Still adorable in her miserableness, though, since all she wants to do is cuddle and have books read to her.

The dog is…. middling. We took her to a specialist last week, who did all kinds of tests and ruled out all sorts of serious illnesses (tick-borne, cancer, Addison’s Disease). So now we’re back to the original diagnosis of pancreatitis. Weird pancreatitis. So we just take care of her and wait, and hopefully she’ll recover. She does seem to be perking up some, though. Still not eating the way I’d like.

And now: back to work.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

Today at Genreality, I’m talking about the unexpected benefits of setting goals that are out of your control.

You know, like the overwhelming joy and surprise of reaching them.

Catch me over there!

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

I’ve been typing all day with one eye on Rio, trying to discern from every little sigh and moan and how long she’s been napping and how much she’s been eating, how she’s feeling and if she’s getting better. It kills me that we aren’t sure what’s wrong, and so we aren’t sure if what we’re doing is helping or what would indicate recovery (other than eating). She’s been eating, some, though certainly not as much as usual, and everything appears to be in working order. But I can’t see her liver and her liver is what is worrying the vet. She seems low energy/spirits today, but it has been gray and snowy out, which always signals “nap day” for my pup. She did rouse herself this evening to go bark at the squirrels in the backyard, and when I came home tonight she was standing on the back of the couch, tail wagging, and watching me through the window. These are things she didn’t do while sick.

But her nose is dry. And she left chicken in her bowl. And she still seems sad. I don’t know if she’s still fighting off the illness or she’s just mad at us for leaving her in the hospital all weekend.

I’m also dealing with other major household diversions of the non-Rio variety. I think it may be time for some outside writing dates. Jess, Lavinia, call me.

I also just have too many darn projects on my plate right now. Plus the siren call of promotion for my upcoming releases, website updates, reviews that have just started trickling in, and the awful chirp of twitter @replies.

Is it any wonder I’m going a little nuts?

Oh, for a writing retreat. Unplug, get out of the house, put my head in one project and FINISH it. Then again, this whole thing with Rio started the last time I left town, and I don’t like leaving while she’s still under the weather.

Bookmark It

Hide Sites