<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GCC: Stephanie Lehmann and The Art of Chick Lit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/</link>
	<description>Novelist, Dog-Lover, Bon Vivant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diana Peterfreund</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5265</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Peterfreund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5265</guid>
		<description>YAY! More snarky anonymous comments!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I read Science fiction all the time. I just finished this year&#039;s Hugo winner, SPIN. No ray guns, but plenty of aliens. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I disagree with everything you say. Oh, except, good catch on the typo. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAY! More snarky anonymous comments!</p>
<p>I read Science fiction all the time. I just finished this year&#8217;s Hugo winner, SPIN. No ray guns, but plenty of aliens. </p>
<p>I disagree with everything you say. Oh, except, good catch on the typo. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5264</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5264</guid>
		<description>The tendencies you mention in science fiction are almost entirely localized within science fiction television shows and film from the mid-twentieth century.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Go read something by a real science fiction author if you want to see the vanguard of modern literature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tendencies you mention in science fiction are almost entirely localized within science fiction television shows and film from the mid-twentieth century.</p>
<p>Go read something by a real science fiction author if you want to see the vanguard of modern literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5263</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5263</guid>
		<description>&quot;as Betsy Taylor has been want to do.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You mean to use the word &quot;wont,&quot; not &quot;want.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You say that chick lit deals with a broad array of situations experienced by the modern woman.  Sure.  There is a strong tendency, however, toward severe superficiality in the characters and messages contained, despite the changing scenery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;as Betsy Taylor has been want to do.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean to use the word &#8220;wont,&#8221; not &#8220;want.&#8221;</p>
<p>You say that chick lit deals with a broad array of situations experienced by the modern woman.  Sure.  There is a strong tendency, however, toward severe superficiality in the characters and messages contained, despite the changing scenery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen McGowan</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5111</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen McGowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5111</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read many chick lit books  that have touched me... Eileen Rendahl&#039;s, DO ME DO MY ROOTS, certainly... GOOD GRIEF by Loly Winston... Rocki St. Claire&#039;s HIT REPLY... and Lani Diane Rich&#039;s TIME OFF FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR... and all of Emily Giffin&#039;s books have touched me in their way. And I just read Robyn Harding&#039;s THE JOURNAL OF MORTIFYING MOMENTS and while maybe it didn&#039;t have any super heavy issues... it did make me think about how many women (me included?) paint relationship failures as personal failures or evidence of character flaws... The Shopaholic series made me think about myself, too... Not that I&#039;m financially irresponsible but I do have other aspects of my life where I ignore mounting problems like Becky does with her finances.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m just going off the top of my head in compiling this list... And it&#039;s late... I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve missed some great ones I&#039;ve loved...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;All that said, I admit to being one of those writers who isn&#039;t keen on the label chick lit. (not that I&#039;d get upset if someone wanted to publish one of my books and call it that... I just don&#039;t really like the label, much...) &lt;br/&gt;I think it has been used to trivialize books by women. &lt;br/&gt;But I would *never* assert that the genre has set back feminism. Au contraire. I think these books have revitalized women&#039;s fiction and shown that there are stories to tell about strong, interesting young female protagonists beyond romances. Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with romances... but I think the chick lit explosion showed there&#039;s a market for books exploring non-romance aspects of young women&#039;s lives. (and I don&#039;t think that market has gone anywhere... it&#039;s just flooded right now.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If one buys into the media assertion that the genre depicts all twenty-something-women as shallow, shoe-shopping, cosmo-drinking, man-hunting twits... Well, I can see where that could lead one to say the genre had set back feminism. &lt;br/&gt;But all one has to do is read a sampling of the bestselling books marketed under the chick lit label to realize that characterization of the genre just isn&#039;t true. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;All that said... I&#039;d love to have a strongly-worded-chat with whoever came up with the label chick lit. Was it someone in the media? Someone in the publishing industry? Anyone know?&lt;br/&gt;I often think that it was the label which created, or at least fueled, all the negative assumptions about the books themselves...&lt;br/&gt;Love the books, but the label makes me squirm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read many chick lit books  that have touched me&#8230; Eileen Rendahl&#8217;s, DO ME DO MY ROOTS, certainly&#8230; GOOD GRIEF by Loly Winston&#8230; Rocki St. Claire&#8217;s HIT REPLY&#8230; and Lani Diane Rich&#8217;s TIME OFF FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR&#8230; and all of Emily Giffin&#8217;s books have touched me in their way. And I just read Robyn Harding&#8217;s THE JOURNAL OF MORTIFYING MOMENTS and while maybe it didn&#8217;t have any super heavy issues&#8230; it did make me think about how many women (me included?) paint relationship failures as personal failures or evidence of character flaws&#8230; The Shopaholic series made me think about myself, too&#8230; Not that I&#8217;m financially irresponsible but I do have other aspects of my life where I ignore mounting problems like Becky does with her finances.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just going off the top of my head in compiling this list&#8230; And it&#8217;s late&#8230; I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve missed some great ones I&#8217;ve loved&#8230;</p>
<p>All that said, I admit to being one of those writers who isn&#8217;t keen on the label chick lit. (not that I&#8217;d get upset if someone wanted to publish one of my books and call it that&#8230; I just don&#8217;t really like the label, much&#8230;) <br />I think it has been used to trivialize books by women. <br />But I would *never* assert that the genre has set back feminism. Au contraire. I think these books have revitalized women&#8217;s fiction and shown that there are stories to tell about strong, interesting young female protagonists beyond romances. Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with romances&#8230; but I think the chick lit explosion showed there&#8217;s a market for books exploring non-romance aspects of young women&#8217;s lives. (and I don&#8217;t think that market has gone anywhere&#8230; it&#8217;s just flooded right now.)</p>
<p>If one buys into the media assertion that the genre depicts all twenty-something-women as shallow, shoe-shopping, cosmo-drinking, man-hunting twits&#8230; Well, I can see where that could lead one to say the genre had set back feminism. <br />But all one has to do is read a sampling of the bestselling books marketed under the chick lit label to realize that characterization of the genre just isn&#8217;t true. </p>
<p>All that said&#8230; I&#8217;d love to have a strongly-worded-chat with whoever came up with the label chick lit. Was it someone in the media? Someone in the publishing industry? Anyone know?<br />I often think that it was the label which created, or at least fueled, all the negative assumptions about the books themselves&#8230;<br />Love the books, but the label makes me squirm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Peterfreund</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5110</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Peterfreund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5110</guid>
		<description>I can always count on anonymous to write the snarky things.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;GCC tours aren&#039;t recommendations, unless they ARE. they are free advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can always count on anonymous to write the snarky things.</p>
<p>GCC tours aren&#8217;t recommendations, unless they ARE. they are free advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5109</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5109</guid>
		<description>ur recommending a writer and a book u haven&#039;t read?  doesn&#039;t make much sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ur recommending a writer and a book u haven&#8217;t read?  doesn&#8217;t make much sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadiquette</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5108</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadiquette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5108</guid>
		<description>Not so long ago, in a mindset far, far, away, I deemed myself far too &quot;intellectual&quot; to read chick lit.  After all, I had lives to save, and futures to protect!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Then I bumped into a copy of Undead and Unwed in an airport.  And you know what?  Betsy spoke to me.  Here was an (un)dead woman, in possession of a stellar shoe collection, going on and living the life she wasted while she was alive, and she&#039;s getting a helluva lot of good sex in the process! &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That truly reached me for some reason.  Probably because I&#039;ve stuck with Mr. You&#039;re So Vain (Formerly known as my spouse) for a way longer than any other woman would have!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Imagine! Me, who writes books about autism, and articles about advocacy, and neurological dysfunctions, and medicaid corruption...lurking by loading docks at bookstores to be the first to lay hands on the next installment of Besty&#039;s story.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And it gets worse.  I just finished the first draft of my own attempt at WRITING chick lit....and good lord, there&#039;s a synopsis for a YA series sitting here on my hard drive...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;M INFECTED!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so long ago, in a mindset far, far, away, I deemed myself far too &#8220;intellectual&#8221; to read chick lit.  After all, I had lives to save, and futures to protect!</p>
<p>Then I bumped into a copy of Undead and Unwed in an airport.  And you know what?  Betsy spoke to me.  Here was an (un)dead woman, in possession of a stellar shoe collection, going on and living the life she wasted while she was alive, and she&#8217;s getting a helluva lot of good sex in the process! </p>
<p>That truly reached me for some reason.  Probably because I&#8217;ve stuck with Mr. You&#8217;re So Vain (Formerly known as my spouse) for a way longer than any other woman would have!</p>
<p>Imagine! Me, who writes books about autism, and articles about advocacy, and neurological dysfunctions, and medicaid corruption&#8230;lurking by loading docks at bookstores to be the first to lay hands on the next installment of Besty&#8217;s story.</p>
<p>And it gets worse.  I just finished the first draft of my own attempt at WRITING chick lit&#8230;.and good lord, there&#8217;s a synopsis for a YA series sitting here on my hard drive&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;M INFECTED!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Leto</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5106</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Leto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5106</guid>
		<description>I happen to know that the next Demon book by Julie Kenner, DEMONS ARE FOREVER, will be turned in to the publisher within the next month. I have no idea about the release date.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m a huge Kenner fan, as well as a friend.  But I honestly inhale all of her books.  She&#039;s finished up the Prada Paradigm as we speak and I CANNOT wait!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Larramie, I agree, I wish it didn&#039;t come down to &quot;that&quot; but it has.  When I worked in the &quot;workplace&quot; (as opposed to alone in my own little house) I saw it happen over and over to women in positions of authority.  If they acted like their male counterparts, they were bitches, even when they were simply doing their jobs.  I got called that more than once when I was teaching high school, simply because I didn&#039;t put up with any crap.  The students (male) would invariably use the word thinking I was going to break down in tears.  My normal response was, &quot;Thank you for noticing&quot; and a referral to the dean.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I rarely had problems with the same kid twice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to know that the next Demon book by Julie Kenner, DEMONS ARE FOREVER, will be turned in to the publisher within the next month. I have no idea about the release date.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a huge Kenner fan, as well as a friend.  But I honestly inhale all of her books.  She&#8217;s finished up the Prada Paradigm as we speak and I CANNOT wait!</p>
<p>Larramie, I agree, I wish it didn&#8217;t come down to &#8220;that&#8221; but it has.  When I worked in the &#8220;workplace&#8221; (as opposed to alone in my own little house) I saw it happen over and over to women in positions of authority.  If they acted like their male counterparts, they were bitches, even when they were simply doing their jobs.  I got called that more than once when I was teaching high school, simply because I didn&#8217;t put up with any crap.  The students (male) would invariably use the word thinking I was going to break down in tears.  My normal response was, &#8220;Thank you for noticing&#8221; and a referral to the dean.</p>
<p>I rarely had problems with the same kid twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larramie</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5105</link>
		<dc:creator>larramie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5105</guid>
		<description>I copy your explanation, Julie, but still bemoan why it must come down to &quot;that.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I copy your explanation, Julie, but still bemoan why it must come down to &#8220;that.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie Damschroder</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/comment-page-1/#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Damschroder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/gcc-stephanie-lehmann-and-the-art-of-chick-lit/#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>Well, Phyllis mentioned mine, but California Demon is a chick lit title that had an impact on me. In fact, I&#039;m very angry with Julie Kenner because there&#039;s no sign of a sequel.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But I disagree that it&#039;s not chick lit.  If we go back to what the publishers said they wanted to publish, books with a hip, contemporary, sharp-witted VOICE, then  the demon-hunter books are totally chick lit.  The reason I loved this one so much was because it was FUN, yet addressed some pretty painful stuff at the same time.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I love books like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Phyllis mentioned mine, but California Demon is a chick lit title that had an impact on me. In fact, I&#8217;m very angry with Julie Kenner because there&#8217;s no sign of a sequel.</p>
<p>But I disagree that it&#8217;s not chick lit.  If we go back to what the publishers said they wanted to publish, books with a hip, contemporary, sharp-witted VOICE, then  the demon-hunter books are totally chick lit.  The reason I loved this one so much was because it was FUN, yet addressed some pretty painful stuff at the same time.</p>
<p>I love books like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

