<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Editorial Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/</link>
	<description>Novelist, Dog-Lover, Bon Vivant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jossan</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-22858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jossan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/on-editorial-advice/#comment-22858</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jossan...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]l I in addition to my guys have been going through the good helpful tips foun rp[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jossan&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]l I in addition to my guys have been going through the good helpful tips foun rp[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Aguirre</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-9417</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Aguirre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/on-editorial-advice/#comment-9417</guid>
		<description>I have admittedly limited experience in this milieu as yet, but I was really pleased with how editorial notes strengthened my book. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There was one spot where I had to do a bit of thinking because the straightforward solution wasn&#039;t going to preserve something I felt needed to be there, but I devised a workaround that I actually think made the book much stronger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have admittedly limited experience in this milieu as yet, but I was really pleased with how editorial notes strengthened my book. </p>
<p>There was one spot where I had to do a bit of thinking because the straightforward solution wasn&#8217;t going to preserve something I felt needed to be there, but I devised a workaround that I actually think made the book much stronger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-9414</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/on-editorial-advice/#comment-9414</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; It can be difficult to break out of the &quot;corrections on a student paper&quot; mindset at first&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I love this.  It certainly DOES seem that way, doesn&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> It can be difficult to break out of the &#8220;corrections on a student paper&#8221; mindset at first</i></p>
<p>I love this.  It certainly DOES seem that way, doesn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celeste</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-9413</link>
		<dc:creator>Celeste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/on-editorial-advice/#comment-9413</guid>
		<description>In the words of a Sheryl Crow song - the first cut is the deepest ;)  It still hurts to admit that you could&#039;ve done something better, but not when you see how much better the finished product is because of your open-mindedness ;) Hitting delete is tough to do, but I rarely regret it anymore once the rewrite is done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the words of a Sheryl Crow song &#8211; the first cut is the deepest <img src='http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   It still hurts to admit that you could&#8217;ve done something better, but not when you see how much better the finished product is because of your open-mindedness <img src='http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Hitting delete is tough to do, but I rarely regret it anymore once the rewrite is done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aden</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-9411</link>
		<dc:creator>aden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/on-editorial-advice/#comment-9411</guid>
		<description>Diana--I did, actually, read that post, and wasn&#039;t commenting about your choice of words. (In fact I originally ran across the phrase as &quot;Murder your darlings,&quot; and I thought that was more insufferable.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I also didn&#039;t mean to echo what you&#039;d written there, but at 3 in the morning I guess I&#039;m more receptive to certain ideas than I thought.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In college I worked at a writing center, and part of our mandate was to offer assistance on student papers. The common responses were of two flavors: &quot;Awesome, I&#039;ll pick this up in twenty minutes when you&#039;ve rewritten it,&quot; or &quot;So you think that sentence doesn&#039;t flow? You can go STRAIGHT TO HELL.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I meant to suggest that for people who are not exposed to the editorial process as a large part of their professional lives, the perception that a critique of the work is a critique of the self probably won&#039;t budge.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(Meekly heads back to the &quot;darlings&quot; thread to make sure I read what was actually there...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diana&#8211;I did, actually, read that post, and wasn&#8217;t commenting about your choice of words. (In fact I originally ran across the phrase as &#8220;Murder your darlings,&#8221; and I thought that was more insufferable.)</p>
<p>I also didn&#8217;t mean to echo what you&#8217;d written there, but at 3 in the morning I guess I&#8217;m more receptive to certain ideas than I thought.</p>
<p>In college I worked at a writing center, and part of our mandate was to offer assistance on student papers. The common responses were of two flavors: &#8220;Awesome, I&#8217;ll pick this up in twenty minutes when you&#8217;ve rewritten it,&#8221; or &#8220;So you think that sentence doesn&#8217;t flow? You can go STRAIGHT TO HELL.&#8221;</p>
<p>I meant to suggest that for people who are not exposed to the editorial process as a large part of their professional lives, the perception that a critique of the work is a critique of the self probably won&#8217;t budge.</p>
<p>(Meekly heads back to the &#8220;darlings&#8221; thread to make sure I read what was actually there&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marley Gibson</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-9410</link>
		<dc:creator>Marley Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/on-editorial-advice/#comment-9410</guid>
		<description>Good post, Diana.  Perceptive and the signs of a mature writer.  We writers do put a lot of ourselves into our work and want to protect it, but in the end, the finished product really is a team effort.  Good advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Diana.  Perceptive and the signs of a mature writer.  We writers do put a lot of ourselves into our work and want to protect it, but in the end, the finished product really is a team effort.  Good advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-9409</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/on-editorial-advice/#comment-9409</guid>
		<description>&quot;too many people see it as adversarial or oppositionally defined&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;it&#039;s because a lot of times, it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;too many people see it as adversarial or oppositionally defined&#8221;</p>
<p>it&#8217;s because a lot of times, it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Peterfreund</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-9407</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Peterfreund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/on-editorial-advice/#comment-9407</guid>
		<description>aden, you should read my &quot;When good advice goes bad&quot; series about &quot;kill your darlings.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aden, you should read my &#8220;When good advice goes bad&#8221; series about &#8220;kill your darlings.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aden</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/on-editorial-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-9406</link>
		<dc:creator>aden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gator465.hostgator.com/~dianablu/on-editorial-advice/#comment-9406</guid>
		<description>I always felt like the phrase &quot;Kill your darlings&quot; was &lt;i&gt;itself&lt;/i&gt; a phrase that needed revising. Always sounded entirely too precious to me.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think your comments about the perception of the editing process are on point--too many people see it as adversarial or oppositionally defined. I don&#039;t think that will change, though (for people outside publishing, at least), since it&#039;s a product of people identifying with their written output.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always felt like the phrase &#8220;Kill your darlings&#8221; was <i>itself</i> a phrase that needed revising. Always sounded entirely too precious to me.</p>
<p>I think your comments about the perception of the editing process are on point&#8211;too many people see it as adversarial or oppositionally defined. I don&#8217;t think that will change, though (for people outside publishing, at least), since it&#8217;s a product of people identifying with their written output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

