<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I&#8217;ve Been Up To</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/what-ive-been-up-to-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/what-ive-been-up-to-3/</link>
	<description>Novelist, Dog-Lover, Bon Vivant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PurpleRanger</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/what-ive-been-up-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-15976</link>
		<dc:creator>PurpleRanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/?p=1814#comment-15976</guid>
		<description>Have you been feeling like . . . crap crap crappity crap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you been feeling like . . . crap crap crappity crap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/what-ive-been-up-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-15974</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/?p=1814#comment-15974</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by publisher_guide: Diana Peterfreund Blog &#124; What I&#039;ve Been Up To: And PublishAmerica, a vanity publishing house, is now tellin.. http://bit.ly/auV3JD...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by publisher_guide: Diana Peterfreund Blog | What I&#8217;ve Been Up To: And PublishAmerica, a vanity publishing house, is now tellin.. <a href="http://bit.ly/auV3JD.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/auV3JD..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/what-ive-been-up-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-15970</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/?p=1814#comment-15970</guid>
		<description>Well, I think most authors are opposed to it because they DON&#039;T have the business acumen OR resources to be all those jobs at once. I was reading John Scalzi&#039;s blog today, and he makes a very good point -- for all that readers seem to think I should take on every bit of job for creating a book -- the editing, the design, the packaging, the printing, the distribution, the marketing, the warehousing, the shipping, the returns -- or I&#039;m not &quot;entrepreneurial&quot; enough, I don&#039;t see people telling cattle ranchers they&#039;d be much better off if they butchered the cow themselves, shopped it to the grocery store themselves, ground up the sirloin themselves, bought all the extra materials for burgers, formed patties, cooked the burgers, put it together, and got it on a plate.

Are we next going to tell tailors to grow their own cotton?

I&#039;m a writer, not a publisher. And as a small business owner myself, I feel no less entrepreneurial because I realize what my business IS and what it isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think most authors are opposed to it because they DON&#8217;T have the business acumen OR resources to be all those jobs at once. I was reading John Scalzi&#8217;s blog today, and he makes a very good point &#8212; for all that readers seem to think I should take on every bit of job for creating a book &#8212; the editing, the design, the packaging, the printing, the distribution, the marketing, the warehousing, the shipping, the returns &#8212; or I&#8217;m not &#8220;entrepreneurial&#8221; enough, I don&#8217;t see people telling cattle ranchers they&#8217;d be much better off if they butchered the cow themselves, shopped it to the grocery store themselves, ground up the sirloin themselves, bought all the extra materials for burgers, formed patties, cooked the burgers, put it together, and got it on a plate.</p>
<p>Are we next going to tell tailors to grow their own cotton?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a writer, not a publisher. And as a small business owner myself, I feel no less entrepreneurial because I realize what my business IS and what it isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.L. Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/what-ive-been-up-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-15969</link>
		<dc:creator>C.L. Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/?p=1814#comment-15969</guid>
		<description>Sorry you&#039;re sick, chica!  Sending cyber hugs and get well wishes.  

I&#039;m not as opposed to the self-publishing business as most authors seem to be.  Entrepreneur&#039;s daughter, and all that.  Hey - why not do it yourself if you have the writing smarts and the business savvy to write a damn good book, put together a decent package (cover art, back cover blurb, endorsement quotes, etc.), handle all your printing and warehousing, set up your own distribution network, and roll out a smoking marketing plan that will get your books in front of your target audience?  

I actually considered doing that before NY picked up my book.  Problem is, doing the jobs of the publisher (which includes printing, packaging, warehousing, sales, distribution, publicity, and editing) as well as the writer -- and the small business owner -- is a VERY tough row to hoe.  My hat is off, in a big way, to anyone willing to tackle that and make a real go of it.  (Jana Oliver, I salute you!)  For those people.  Very narrow VERTICAL MARKET SEGMENTATION is key.  Find your writing niche - it has to be a definable, accessible niche you can specifically exploit for a minimum of $$.  Write to that niche.  Build your reputation by excelling in that niche, then expand.  That is the most proven small business recipe for success.  The odds of writing a book, self publishing, then hitting the NY times with that self-published book (without ever selling the rights to NY) are about as likely as winning the Mega Jackpot lottery.

What I *am* vehemently opposed to outfits that massively overcharge writers, provide next to nothing from an editorial standpoint, and lure writers in with promises like &quot;Be the star of your own booksigning&quot; and &quot;You too can be a Published Author and see your book on the shelves at bookstores across America!&quot; (which most POD and self-pubs eventually learn is not going to happen).  These outfits are snake oil salesmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry you&#8217;re sick, chica!  Sending cyber hugs and get well wishes.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not as opposed to the self-publishing business as most authors seem to be.  Entrepreneur&#8217;s daughter, and all that.  Hey &#8211; why not do it yourself if you have the writing smarts and the business savvy to write a damn good book, put together a decent package (cover art, back cover blurb, endorsement quotes, etc.), handle all your printing and warehousing, set up your own distribution network, and roll out a smoking marketing plan that will get your books in front of your target audience?  </p>
<p>I actually considered doing that before NY picked up my book.  Problem is, doing the jobs of the publisher (which includes printing, packaging, warehousing, sales, distribution, publicity, and editing) as well as the writer &#8212; and the small business owner &#8212; is a VERY tough row to hoe.  My hat is off, in a big way, to anyone willing to tackle that and make a real go of it.  (Jana Oliver, I salute you!)  For those people.  Very narrow VERTICAL MARKET SEGMENTATION is key.  Find your writing niche &#8211; it has to be a definable, accessible niche you can specifically exploit for a minimum of $$.  Write to that niche.  Build your reputation by excelling in that niche, then expand.  That is the most proven small business recipe for success.  The odds of writing a book, self publishing, then hitting the NY times with that self-published book (without ever selling the rights to NY) are about as likely as winning the Mega Jackpot lottery.</p>
<p>What I *am* vehemently opposed to outfits that massively overcharge writers, provide next to nothing from an editorial standpoint, and lure writers in with promises like &#8220;Be the star of your own booksigning&#8221; and &#8220;You too can be a Published Author and see your book on the shelves at bookstores across America!&#8221; (which most POD and self-pubs eventually learn is not going to happen).  These outfits are snake oil salesmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/what-ive-been-up-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-15968</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/?p=1814#comment-15968</guid>
		<description>Hi, Laura! No, I didn&#039;t see it, Must go check it out.

I feel like everything PA does is to delude their clients. I am not a fan of commercial self-publishing, but I also see that there is a very good niche for it (say you&#039;re publishing something for your community, family, special interest group, etc.) And I think there are far better (and cheaper) outfits to go to than PA for those needs (Lulu does an excellent product) and there are far too many PA authors who mistakenly think that their &quot;publishing&quot; contract is going to secure them spots in Barnes &amp; Noble. 

It&#039;s interesting though, because most of what PA says seems geared toward convincing their authors that they&#039;ve got it as good as it comes, and now to come out and say &quot;well, you could be a Random House author...&quot; is very interesting to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Laura! No, I didn&#8217;t see it, Must go check it out.</p>
<p>I feel like everything PA does is to delude their clients. I am not a fan of commercial self-publishing, but I also see that there is a very good niche for it (say you&#8217;re publishing something for your community, family, special interest group, etc.) And I think there are far better (and cheaper) outfits to go to than PA for those needs (Lulu does an excellent product) and there are far too many PA authors who mistakenly think that their &#8220;publishing&#8221; contract is going to secure them spots in Barnes &#038; Noble. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting though, because most of what PA says seems geared toward convincing their authors that they&#8217;ve got it as good as it comes, and now to come out and say &#8220;well, you could be a Random House author&#8230;&#8221; is very interesting to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/what-ive-been-up-to-3/comment-page-1/#comment-15967</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/?p=1814#comment-15967</guid>
		<description>That PublishAmerica bit is interesting (not least of which because I work at Harper).  On one hand, I do find it wildly funny that they&#039;re calling a distribution center their neighbor, falsely implying that editors work there.  But ultimately it makes me sad because think of all the misguided and hopeful authors who aren&#039;t likely to see the results they want from PA and really do believe they have an &quot;in&quot; with Random House.

Off-topic, did you see Story Siren&#039;s review of &quot;Rampant&quot; this morning?  FANTASTIC and CONGRATS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That PublishAmerica bit is interesting (not least of which because I work at Harper).  On one hand, I do find it wildly funny that they&#8217;re calling a distribution center their neighbor, falsely implying that editors work there.  But ultimately it makes me sad because think of all the misguided and hopeful authors who aren&#8217;t likely to see the results they want from PA and really do believe they have an &#8220;in&#8221; with Random House.</p>
<p>Off-topic, did you see Story Siren&#8217;s review of &#8220;Rampant&#8221; this morning?  FANTASTIC and CONGRATS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

